I have really been wrestling with this idea of just-war and if it is something that I should align myself with or not.  I have done some research and found some of the “rules” for a just war. My experience has been that in the church we have shied away from this subject and silenced our voices. Unfortunately I believe that in some churches and among some circles of Evangelicals we have looked down upon someone for questioning our current government and their decisions.  I am also sometimes confused on who we are aligning ourselves with: is it Jesus or the Republican Party?  As a Christian I have to ask myself some tough questions. As followers of Jesus are we to agree with this war? Is this how Jesus would deal with this issue? Here are the rules by which a war is considered just:

  • A just war can only be waged as a last resort. All non-violent options must be exhausted before the use of force can be justified.
  • A war is just only if it is waged by a legitimate authority. Even just causes cannot be served by actions taken by individuals or groups who do not constitute an authority sanctioned by whatever the society and outsiders to the society deem legitimate.
  • A just war can only be fought to redress a wrong suffered. For example, self-defense against an armed attack is always considered to be a just cause (although the justice of the cause is not sufficient–see point #4). Further, a just war can only be fought with “right” intentions: the only permissible objective of a just war is to redress the injury.
  • A war can only be just if it is fought with a reasonable chance of success. Deaths and injury incurred in a hopeless cause are not morally justifiable.
  • The ultimate goal of a just war is to re-establish peace. More specifically, the peace established after the war must be preferable to the peace that would have prevailed if the war had not been fought.
  • The violence used in the war must be proportional to the injury suffered. States are prohibited from using force not necessary to attain the limited objective of addressing the injury suffered.
  • The weapons used in war must discriminate between combatants and non-combatants. Civilians are never permissible targets of war, and every effort must be taken to avoid killing civilians. The deaths of civilians are justified only if they are unavoidable victims of a deliberate attack on a military target.
  • I would like to start a dialogue regarding this idea. I am not saying that I am right or have everything nailed down when it comes to these ideas.

    However, I do believe that as a Christian I am supposed to follow Jesus’ lead. I do believe that Jesus was a creative guy and if He were here today He would have some creative ways when it comes to dealing with these issues.

    What are your thoughts?